The Local Actions Non-Dam Alternative (LAND)

While reducing flood damage in the Chehalis Basin is urgent, it also requires serious thought and consideration to conserve the Basin’s rich ecosystem.

The Local Actions Non-Dam (LAND) Alternative is an effort to develop and evaluate a comprehensive, Basin-wide flood damage reduction approach that includes alternatives to the flood retention flow-through dam proposed by the Flood Control Zone District—taking into account long-term flood damage reduction, impacts on local wildlife, impacts on residents and businesses, and cost.

The LAND team leading the effort has completed their initial report and recommendation on a system of levees, a diversion, conveyance improvements, and other actions to reduce flood damages. The next step is to work out the feasibility of that system, and to compare it to the proposed flow-through dam.

Follow the LAND Alternatives Development

You can read more about emerging potential alternatives, meet the LAND team, view interactive maps, and sign up for LAND Alternatives updates at ChehalisBasinLAND.com.

Webinar: Preview the Local Actions Non-Dam Alternatives (LAND)

Looking for more information on the current options under consideration? Listen to the Office of Chehalis Basin and partners give a one-hour informational update, plus answer community members’ questions. Closed captioning is available in English and Spanish.

VIEW THE RECORDING

Questions and Answers

On October 9, 2024, representatives for the LAND and the flood retention flow-through dam held a webinar to answer questions about their respective projects. Many of the questions below were raised during that webinar. 

Q: Will Ecology be preparing new draft environmental impact statements for the proposed Local Actions Non-Dam Alternative (LAND) project and proposed flood-retention dam and associated temporary reservoir on the Chehalis River? If so, what is the timeline for public review? What is the timeline for action by the Chehalis Basin Board?

Q: In 2023, the Chehalis Basin Board reported that Weyerhaeuser had refused to cooperate with a study the Board approved to address data gaps about the basin-scale impacts of forest practices on hydrology, flooding, and summer low flow levels. Has the company’s position changed? If not, should further planning for the proposed dam be halted until Weyerhaeuser cooperates?

Q: Don’t levees, as proposed under the LAND proposal, just transfer flooding downstream and make it worse for others?

Q: Can you please address the state environmental review process under the State Environmental Policy Act and the federal review process under the National Environmental Policy Act?

Q: Is the Chehalis Basin Board planning to provide flood damage assistance for homes or apartments? Are there any resources for improving property drainage?

Q: Will there will be a committee who will work on the next phase of LAND? If so, who will be on the committee?

Q: Where can one see a projected 2080 flood map?

Q: The only reason a dam or LAND are needed is because of short rotation timber harvesting in the headwaters and continued development in the floodplain down river. Why should the public pay for a dam to offset the impacts of Weyerhaueser forest management practices and City and County government development approvals?

Q: I live in the Skookumchuck and it floods there. How will the proposed dam help me and my neighbors?

Q: It’s important for community members to better understand how the flood-damage reduction projects being proposed for the Chehalis basin will be funded. How will the proposed LAND project be funded? How will the proposed flood-retention dam be funded? Would state or federal funding be used? How about local taxes?

Q: What impact would measures such as the levees or diversions proposed under the LAND have on aquatic resources, cultural resources, and ecological processes?